With the following procedure:
However, the following requires maturity. Not everyone is willing to accept a few days of learning in exchange for subsequent years of ease. For about the first hour, it will be tough. After that, you will be very happy as your ability grows. |
Instructions:
That’s all there is to it. After that first hour of hard slogging, you’ll see that it really is as easy and rewarding as I say. |
There are interesting stories behind the keyboard layout, and some interesting people have made them available to us. I recommend these links to their information about the layout, and I think you will be interested in their thoughts on other subjects too.
The following links give approaches to the subject with which I disagree, but you are a different person than I am, so maybe you will prefer them:
|
I don’t know all of the years of research that Dvorak put into this layout, but I notice the following features that seem to contribute to its effectiveness:
The vowels are all given to the left hand, and it strikes only the least-used consonants. Since, to a great extent, vowels and consonants tend to alternate, the two hands tend to alternate strokes, so that one hand can make a keystroke while the other hand is recovering from a keystroke.
The most-used keys are on the home row. The second most-used keys are on the row above it. Only relatively rarely do the fingers need to go out of these two rows.
Common two-letter combinations are particularly easy to type. For example, “TH” and “SH” fit the familiar pattern of finger drumming.
I have read a claim that the Dvorak layout makes little or no difference. The only basis for this claim seems to be that, when anyone switches to the Dvorak layout, he/she practices to learn the new layout, and that that practice, rather than the different layout, makes the difference in speed and accuracy.
The only real point that that argument makes is that a more complex observation is necessary than a simple improvement in speed. For that, I can offer the anecdotal evidence of my own experience.
I learned to touch-type on the Scholes/Qwerty layout by the above-described “Just-do-it.” method. About ten years later, I learned to touch-type on the Dvorak layout by the same method. Thus, I learned each layout with the same degree of assiduity, and with the same level of practice, consisting of many years of routine use, but no specific training or practice sessions. On the Scholes/Qwerty layout, my typing speed asymptoted to about 25 words per minute. On the Dvorak layout, my typing speed asymptoted to about 50 words per minute.
Other than that, I think that the above explanation of “How It Works” shows a reduction in physical work per unit of output by about a factor of two.
Admittedly, these are rough numerical measures, and my own experience is only anecdotal evidence. However, it is the best evidence of which I am aware of the relative merits of the two keyboard layouts.
Contact us.
Up to Davis Home Page.