North Renfrew Times
March 31, 2011

Chamber moves closer to merger

by Vance Gutzman

Despite opposition to the idea from some of its members, the Deep River and District Chamber of Commerce (DRCC) is one step closer to merging with its larger brethren, the Upper Ottawa Valley Chamber of Commerce.

Members who attended the DRCC's annual general meeting last week have given the chamber's new executive the green light to pursue amalgamation talks with the Upper Ottawa Valley Chamber (UOVCC).

Amalgamation has been a hot-button topic at the chamber for some time.

It was a year ago in March, in fact, that the chamber of commerce met to vote on a resolution calling upon the executive  to pursue the steps needed for it to give up its charter and become a division of the UOVCC.

Advantages in doing so, cited at the time, included the suggestion that the UOVCC could bring a stronger lobbying power to bear, seeing as how it has 320 members, compared to the DRCC's 48.

Also cited as an advantage is the fact the UOVCC  employs a full-time administrative staff person in Pembroke, whereas all the administrative work  for the local chamber of commerce is done on a volunteer basis - and those volunteers are starting to feel burnt out.

"We need more volunteers," outgoing DRCC president Jim Macmillan said at last week's AGM.

"That's what's driving us to look at amalgamation."

But while members of the chamber's executive were then and still are in favour of amalgamation, not all of the membership is.

One of its most vocal opponents is Deep River lawyer George LeConte, who sent a missive to the executive calling for last week's amalgamation motion to be postponed by one month, as he was slated to be out of town on the date of the AGM.

"There has been no fair notice of this motion to me and others," LeConte stated in his letter to the DRCC.

"If the executive does not permit this fair adjournment that I have requested in writing then what the executive has done is that it has unfairly orchestrated a result without fair opportunity to debate that result."

LeConte went on to state that he and others in the business community believe in the need for a "free and independent" local business voice, and that the local business constituency has unique local characteristics.

Despite LeConte's urging that last week's meeting be postponed, the meeting went on with an amalgamation resolution on the table, albeit just barely.

That's because the chamber of commerce just barely had a quorum in order to vote on the matter.

According to its bylaws, the chamber needs at least 15 of its members to be in attendance in order to vote on procedural items.

There were, in fact, just 14 members present last week, but a recent change to the chamber's bylaws allows for proxy votes, and three members had sent in proxy forms to the AGM.

A year ago, when the same resolution came into play, only 14 members were again present, despite the fact special notices were sent out to all members ahead of time, so it died on the table because of the lack of proxies.

Turnouts like that for the chamber's meetings, while being one of the reasons behind its executive's push for amalgamation with the UOVCC, are a source of frustration for the executive members as well.

"I think we should have brought champagne tonight, because we actually have a quorum," home-based business owner Yvonne Stothers lamented last week.

"You have to give us credit for trying to make things better for the membership."

Still, some business owners in attendance remained unconvinced of the merits of amalgamation.

"If you can't get people to come out and sit on the board, who's going to drive all the way to Pembroke," asked pharmacy owner Christine Harding.

"I think you're going to lose your voice."

Her concerns were echoed by chartered accountant Chris Carroll.

"You'd be losing your autonomy. You'd be giving up your authority," Carroll said of the merger plans.

"You'd no longer control what issues you could take on. You're kidding yourself if you think it would be the same, only better.

“It would be different, and I remain unconvinced that would be better."

In the end, however, the motion to explore merger talks with the UOVCC passed by a margin of 13-4, with the chamber's executive promising that nothing has yet been carved in stone.

"Give us the go-ahead to work out some things and we'll bring it back for another vote," Stothers said.


>> Back to homepage